Webreliance on precedent in constitutional interpretation is said to provide more predictability, consistency, and stability in the law for judges, legislators, lawyers,. Webthis article connects the scope of precedent with recurring and foundational debates about the proper ends of judicial interpretation. Webthe supreme court, unanimously, ruled that it had the power to strike down laws, statutes, and government actions if they were found to be unconstitutional. Webthe power of judicial review. The supreme court can strike down any law or other action by the legislative or executive branch that violates the constitution. Webby exercising its power to determine the constitutionality of federal and state government actions, the supreme court has developed a large body of judicial. Webreliance on precedent in constitutional interpretation is said to provide more predictability, consistency, and stability in the law for judges, legislators, lawyers, and political branches and institutions that rely on the court’s rulings; Prevent the court from overruling all. Webthis essay’s concept of judicial precedent is limited to prior decisions of the supreme court. However, the concept of precedent is arguably much broader, encompassing. Webwhen the supreme court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; Its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment. Webwhen the supreme court decides how the law, and the constitution, should be interpreted, that interpretation becomes a precedent. Once that judicial precedent.
